Moderate Spelling Errors

So... These are some different philosophies I have written... I hope you enjoy them.

"If we took away all things bought by people to define their sense of self, would there be anyone left?"

WE: World as a whole and/or one.

TOOK AWAY: Temporarily removed

ALL THINGS BOUGHT: hair dye, plastic surgery, clothes, homes, art supplies, etc. (and although jobs are not bought they would fall into this definition as well.)

DEFINE THEIR SENSE OF SELF: actions taken to give one a sense of individuality.

PEOPLE: world's population

IF and WOULD: display hypothetical situation

ANYONE: individuals

LEFT: remaining

I encourage you to think about this and come to your own decision but here are some of my thoughts on this. (all of which are one hundred percent my own. PLEASE DO NOT COPY THESE UNLESS YOU GIVE ME FULL CREDIT.)

I personally cannot imagine a world without a way to hold my own thoughts and read others. (pens, paper, books)

Some create with words, through writing (pens, paper) or music (insturments). Others create with colors and sences (paint, art supplies, cameras, and so on). And others simply do not create. Would those, (the ones who do not identify themselves with a certain brand or something along those lines) be the ones who remain? I suppose children also would indeed remain, for what other children wear or look like matters not to them. Unless they are taught so. So does this mean that only innocent children and those who have no creativity will remain?

Here is another theory I came up with.

Going through trail and triumph both, we achieve on mandatory thing for life. Creativity. Meaning behind flowing words, colorful pictures would become unattainable without both trail and triumph. Trail, because without struggle, frustration, and all else that follows trail, we could not achieve triumph. And therefore, no knowing of beauty or happiness. Without triumph, there would be no trail, therefore no known emotions. Without knowing emotions, we find ourselves in a grey area. Not knowing pain or happiness we would not be aware of the lifeless situation we are in. But, because trail in a life will not fade, and from trail comes triumph, there is no fear of this, unless it becomes forced. When in this grey area an individual would not be able to feel anything. This concept would appear tourchourous to you or I, but to them it would be the norm. Or normal to us if we were there. And without emotions creativity would be unnattianable. We could easily paint what we see, but why it would matter would become unfigurable. Therefore taking away the true meaning of creativity.

And here are some thoughts on what it means to hate:

Is it truly out of human nature to be peaceful? Or are we taught to hate one another? Are violence and hate learned or perhaps even forced behaviors?

LEARNED/TAUGHT: By what is set up and shown

FORCED: By actions of others resulting in resentment of such people.

If taught, why does it carry such passion?

When learned perhaps it results in an almost false passion, or falso predijuce. This is because when taught to hate, it is always from a baised person. And when a biased person teaches another their views it most likely will rub off onto them. And because the majority population does not think for itself, it is easy to teach hate.

Or perhaps it is just a combination of both.

If we all see the wrong in wars and fighting why do we stand aside and let it continue?

And finally, a few scattered thoughts on parenting. These are just barely starting to form. The main concept came from a man, I do not know his name, but I give him credit for this:

"If you ever have kids the secert is to never be in a rush"

Childhood really ought to be a time of free running bliss and a guiding eye of freedom.

Thats all for now.